TPO 28
The reading passage claims that Peary is one of the most famous adventurers who reached the North Pole during 1909, based on his claims and records and also, there are several pieces of evidence to show the accuracy of his claim. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author contends that the national geographic committee conducted a research and investigation whether Peary's claim is accurate or not. So, they declared that his claim was correct and he reached the North Pole. In contrast, the lecturer underlines the fact that the committee was not completely objective because all of its members were Peary's close friends who funded his travel. Also, they investigated the travel only in two days, which represents they did not carry out the research carefully.
Furthermore, the author holds the view that Peary reached the North Pole only in 37days as like as Avery who traveled during 37 days. Conversely, the professor brings up the idea that both journeys are different in some case. For instance, Avery carried fewer objects and foods and his meals delivered through the air and his travel was in more favorable weather condition. So, these examples show why Avery reached his destination in 37 days. But the travel of Peary would have taken more time to reach.
Finally, as set forth by the author Peary had taken myriads of photo and by the measurement of shadows and the position of surfs of the sun, it's crystal clear that he reached the North Pole. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that this measurement needs a highly developed technic and also, a high-quality photographer. But all of the photos are taken by a primitive camera and photos are become faded and looked lured. So, these photos could not be used to calculate the surf of sun.
Having scrutinized all the ideas, a logical conclusion that can be drawn is that there are loads of information having been overlooked by the author while the presence of which could strengthen the author's claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 356, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... also, a high-quality photographer. But all of the photos are taken by a primitive camera ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, then, while, for instance, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 353.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91501416431 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48592245396 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538243626062 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.722667903 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4375 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406897567621 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129492142227 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111249623381 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208443783151 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659601200931 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.