The reading and lecture both discuss the hypothesis of edmontosaurs migration. While the reading states three claims to support the dinosaurs migration to south, the professor refutes that, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading mentions that edmontosaurs migrated to the south to find food. This is because they could not find food in the winter on the north slope. However, the professor argues this notion saying that edmontosaurs do not have to migrate to find food. Moreover, there was warmer climate on the north slope and the sunshine was for tweenty four hours. So, the extreme day light gave chance for palnts to grow. As a result, these animals can find food at winter period.
In addition, the article avers that the skeletons that found in that area shows that these edmontosaurs were live in herds and the most modern animals are living in herds too. On the other hand, the professor rejects this idea by explaining that living in herds does not mean that they migrate. Furthermore, they might live in herds for protection from preditors. For instance, rosevilles that live in United States are living in herds, but they do not migrate. So, living in herds does not grante the migration pattern.
Lastly, the articles mentions that the edmontosaurs can migrate for long distance. Nevertheless, the professor argues this point by pointing out that the adult animlas can migrtae for long distance, but the small one could not do that. Moreover, the endomotosaurs have young junville that could not migrate for long distance. As a result, these animals could not travel alone and leave their young junville. Consequently, they have to stay with the their young juniville and survive together.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dinosaurs'' or 'dinosaur's'?
Suggestion: dinosaurs'; dinosaur's
...ding states three claims to support the dinosaurs migration to south, the professor refut...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es that, saying none of these claims are convincing. Firstly, the reading ment...
^^
Line 7, column 446, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...e. Consequently, they have to stay with the their young juniville and survive together.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, as for, for instance, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08041958042 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51747523309 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496503496503 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4680610599 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7222222222 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361661443488 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116904882184 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582455900446 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202796854644 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683699818658 0.0443174109184 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.