TPO 31- Integrated Task
The article passage and professor both discuss the authenticity of theories attributed to Sinosauropteryx was a feathered dinosaur. The author contends that critis opposed the idea that Sinosauropteryx had feathers, stating three conspicuous reasons so as to support. However, the lecturer, having a critical point of view, casts a shadow of doubt on what the author proposes. She exlpains that the evidences are strong that support Sinosauropteryx had feathers and the arguments in the reading are unconvincing, and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the author claims that the pattern o lines surrounding the skeleton bones may were formed after the animal's death. On the contrary, the professor, not having been convinced, declares that it is unlikely that the lines are results of decomposition. She also proceeds to state that there are other fossils found in the same site, but their skins are well preserved in ash. Therefore, it is likely that the fossils of Sinosauropteryx are also well preserved. Thus, the lines are feathers.
Second, the author posits that the lines are fossilized remains of frills. The lecturer opposes this point, saying that chemical analysis proves the opposite. To elucidate more on this issue, she states that the chemical composition of feathers is different from frills.Feathers have a huge amount of protein, but frills do not have it. Nonetheless, chemical analysis showed that the functional structures contain a lot of protein. Consequently, they are feathers.
Finally the author highlights the fact that the location of lines are along the backbone and the tail which make the useless for flight and thermoregulation; thus, they were not feathers. However, the proffesor explains that feathers have other uses. She sheds some light on this premise, stating that there is a bird, peacock, that has long feathers along the tail. It displays them to attract a mate. On the other hand, recently scientists showed that the sturctures of the fossils are colorful, i.e. orange and white. This supports the theory that Sinosauropteryx used feathers for displaying.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...hers, stating three conspicuous reasons so as to support. However, the lecturer, having ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...keleton bones may were formed after the animals death. On the contrary, the professor, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Feathers
...on of feathers is different from frills.Feathers have a huge amount of protein, but fril...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...in. Consequently, they are feathers. Finally the author highlights the fact that the...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on this premise, stating that there is a bird, peacock, that has long feathers al...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nonetheless', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'as to', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.259842519685 0.261695866417 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.178477690289 0.158904122519 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0551181102362 0.0723426182421 76% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0446194225722 0.0435111971325 103% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0314960629921 0.0277247811725 114% => OK
Prepositions: 0.112860892388 0.128828473217 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0393700787402 0.0370669169778 106% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.96586923065 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0131233595801 0.0208969081088 63% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.136482939633 0.128158765124 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00262467191601 0.0158828679856 17% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0131233595801 0.0114777025283 114% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2122.0 1645.83664459 129% => OK
No of words: 334.0 271.125827815 123% => OK
Chars per words: 6.35329341317 6.08160592843 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04852973271 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.395209580838 0.374372842146 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.308383233533 0.287516216867 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.233532934132 0.187439937562 125% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.134730538922 0.113142543107 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96586923065 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 145.348785872 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547904191617 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 58.9853322863 53.8517498576 110% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0529801325 161% => OK
Sentence length: 15.9047619048 21.7502111507 73% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6338548407 49.3711431718 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.047619048 132.220823453 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9047619048 21.7502111507 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.857142857143 0.878197800319 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.39072847682 147% => OK
Readability: 46.7430852581 50.5018328374 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.61855670103 1.90840788429 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.756270153308 0.549887131256 138% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.100482630915 0.142949733639 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0847067893782 0.0787303798458 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.535530315671 0.631733273073 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.180846902434 0.139662658121 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.321258146195 0.266732575781 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159184173406 0.103435571967 154% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.500401394965 0.414875509568 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0286697035685 0.0530846634433 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.593595818148 0.40443939384 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365585842088 0.0528353158467 69% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.26048565121 211% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 10.2958057395 155% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.