tpo 32
The reading discussed three reasons which could possibly created the strange sound that Russian submarines detected in the years between 1960 and 1980. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some points to refute them all.
First, the author argues that these sounds could have been created by orca whales that lived in that area. Conversely, the lecturer casts doubt on this idea by stating that this kind of whales mostly lives near the surface of the ocean and Russian submarines could not detect their noise because they mainly stated in the deep water. Moreover, she states that if the source of these sounds were the whales, submarines sonar system was able detect them. As a result, the might not produce these sounds.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the idea that Giant squids Might produce these noises. In the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that the Russian submarines first detected these sounds in 1960s and these kind of noises have been reported for 20 years. Eventually, these sounds have been stopped after that time, while the giant squids already live in that place. So, if these animals was the source of these sounds, why should the stopped creating them after 1980s.
Finally, the reading asserts that other countries` secret submarines could produce these noises. In contrast, the lecturer dismisses this issue by stating that the source of these sounds moved very fast and changed its direction quickly and other countries ware simply not able to build such a fast submarine. Besides, she claims that if the sources of these sounds were other countries` submarines, the Russian sailors should have detected the engines` noise of them. So, they were not be the source of these strange noises.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...e reading discussed three reasons which could possibly created the strange sound that Russian ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1960s'.
Suggestion: in the 1960s
... submarines first detected these sounds in 1960s and these kind of noises have been repo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...irst detected these sounds in 1960s and these kind of noises have been reported for 20 yea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...changed its direction quickly and other countries ware simply not able to build such a fa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 502, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...' noise of them. So, they were not be the source of these strange noises.
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'while', 'in contrast', 'kind of', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230303030303 0.261695866417 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.145454545455 0.158904122519 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0575757575758 0.0723426182421 80% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0636363636364 0.0435111971325 146% => OK
Pronouns: 0.030303030303 0.0277247811725 109% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121212121212 0.128828473217 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0363636363636 0.0370669169778 98% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.31521873959 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00606060606061 0.0208969081088 29% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.157575757576 0.128158765124 123% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0212121212121 0.0158828679856 134% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0121212121212 0.0114777025283 106% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1776.0 1645.83664459 108% => OK
No of words: 290.0 271.125827815 107% => OK
Chars per words: 6.12413793103 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.375862068966 0.374372842146 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.251724137931 0.287516216867 88% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.120689655172 0.187439937562 64% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0758620689655 0.113142543107 67% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31521873959 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510344827586 0.539623497131 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.5730422447 53.8517498576 94% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.7142857143 21.7502111507 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2241970884 49.3711431718 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.857142857 132.220823453 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 21.7502111507 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.928571428571 0.878197800319 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.39072847682 147% => OK
Readability: 45.8866995074 50.5018328374 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.62025316456 1.90840788429 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.682009890585 0.549887131256 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.142569583897 0.142949733639 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.069621045735 0.0787303798458 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.631160142495 0.631733273073 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.101587098537 0.139662658121 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.339403883577 0.266732575781 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880804524134 0.103435571967 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.476207465581 0.414875509568 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0879858969666 0.0530846634433 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.517779704524 0.40443939384 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524848291168 0.0528353158467 99% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.