tpo 32
The reading asserts that some plausible theories will be the cause of the sound which was produced in oceans. The lecturer, however, finds the ideas dubious and casts doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
The author argues the source of the sound was that of ocra whales during the courtship ritual. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that ocra whales lived near the surface while submarines were in deep oceans, therefore the possibility of hearing that sound is near zero. Moreover, if the reason for the sound was ocra whale, they should be detected by submarines.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that the other likely reason for sounds might have been the giant squids which live in deep oceans. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that these strange noises stopped after two decades, although the squids still lived there. Thus it is not true that these animals generated the sounds.
Finally, the reading states that perhaps noises might have been produced by other country's submarine which was secretly controlling the area. On the other hand, the lecturer mentions that those sounds were changing their direction rapidly, and also no engine noise could be heard. The professor asserts that until now, our technology has not improved in such a way that could have these fast and silent submarines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...asons proposed by the reading passage. The author argues the source of the sound w...
^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... although the squids still lived there. Thus it is not true that these animals gener...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07111111111 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29932894129 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582222222222 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0802196979 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.727272727 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06452816374 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326025783495 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11206295562 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636263209128 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177271346224 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738031116839 0.0443174109184 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.