tpo 38 integrated task
The reading discusses how international funding will help to prevent deforestation. However, the lecturer finds the ideas dubious and casts on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
First, the author argues that dispersing money will give rise to protecting forests since they will resist against industries. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that since most farmers now use modern agriculture, which needs fertilizer or pesticide, it will be more harmful than industries intrusion. because it will pollute the water and wastage
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that by developing villages economy, so they do not need to change their forest lands to other types. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that it is not guaranteed that the money will disperse adequately and may be used for other purposes.
Finally, the reading passage asserts that as biodiversity is essential for human's lives, funding for them is necessary. In contrast, the speaker dismisses the issue due to the fact that these funding will be spent on tree plantation, which has commercial intentions and would not help to maintain biodiversity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 311, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...more harmful than industries intrusion. because it will pollute the water and wastage ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se it will pollute the water and wastage Furthermore, the reading passage holds t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, may, so, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 183.0 270.72406181 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36612021858 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8348597624 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644808743169 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0950043646 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.75 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.