TPO 35 Integrated ٌWriting
In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M. Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book (manuscript) written on vellum
The reading passage discusses three possible theories for the origin of the Voynich manuscript. The lecturer disagrees with all three theories and refute them one by one.
First, the lecturer does not believe Anthony Ascham is the writer of Voynich manuscript. because the manuscript was written in special code, it does not fit into Anthony Ascham's background as a common physician. In Anthony Ascham's book A little Herbal, he only wrote about plants that were well-known then. With his knowledge set, Anthony Ascham should not be able to write a book with such elaborate codes as in voynich manuscript. even though the many plant illustration in Voynich manuscript do look close to Ascham's book, it is still unlike that Acham wrote the manuscript.
Second, the lecturer thinks Edward Kelley did not write the manuscript either. because judging from how good of care the creator took of the book, the texts were real codes meant to delivery some meanings. while people from 16th century were easy to fool, Edward had no need to put in this much work just to fool people.
Last, the lecturer argues that Wilfrid himself could not be the writer either. because by using dating technology it is confirmed that the vellum and ink used to create Voynich manuscript are both over 400 years old, while Wilfrid lived in 20th century. even he could use vellum of the same age from somewhere else, he would not have access to ink around that time. So this indicates the manuscript has to be created centuries before Wilfrid obtained it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...m is the writer of Voynich manuscript. because the manuscript was written in special c...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rite a book with such elaborate codes as in voynich manuscript. even though the...
^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a book with such elaborate codes as in voynich manuscript. even though the man...
^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...rate codes as in voynich manuscript. even though the many plant illustration in V...
^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...y did not write the manuscript either. because judging from how good of care the creat...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...codes meant to delivery some meanings. while people from 16th century were easy to f...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in this much work just to fool people. Last, the lecturer argues that Wilfrid h...
^^^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...himself could not be the writer either. because by using dating technology it is confir...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
..., while Wilfrid lived in 20th century. even he could use vellum of the same age fro...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, second, so, still, then, well, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34872179767 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.644333663 49.2860985944 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.0 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179671739133 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624597341407 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441338239973 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905095593896 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495780339459 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.