TPO 38- Integrated writing
The world's forests are facing increasing pressure which, if unchecked, will threaten the health of many industries, economies, nations, and lives. The development of an international fund to help developing countries implement useful conservation techniques in forest protection is the best way to protect the world's forests and hopefully reverse negative trends that imperil our forests.
The reading and the lecture are both about the increasing pressure to the forest around the world and that this affects many at an economic level and even people lives. The author of the reading feels this can to be stopped by the creation of an international fund to financial different solutions in developmental countries. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He is of the opinion that the problem is real but the solutions presented in the reading are promoting deforestation instead.
To begin with, the author argues that the protection of the forest agriculture is the better way to avoid that this kind of land become part of industries. The article mentions that to give funds to farmers will persuade them to sell their properties. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that agriculture is bad because is the most destructive force to forest. Additionally, he says that in agriculture it is use pesticides that end up in water pollution and it is not good to the environment.
Secondly, the writer suggests that the found should be given to development economies. In the article, it is said that are villages and tribal residents who should receive the found. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that are these particular people the forest donors, even from the government and for that they are inadequate to decide what to do with the founds given. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that it will be impossible the control of the money.
Finally, the author posits that this found could help government and people to create protected areas. Moreover, it is stated in the article that this protect biodiversity and species from extinction. In contrast, the lecturer’s position is that people will choose to plant trees with commercial purpose. He notes that this will not help to biodiversity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t solutions in developmental countries. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01592356688 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85238867282 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525477707006 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2620958463 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6470588235 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132899039035 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399403785978 0.0996497079465 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460421103376 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761632745836 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308330249543 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.