TPO 39
The reading discusses the different possible explanations of the mass-extinction that happened at the end of the Triassic period. It provides three theories. The professor however, states that although the theories mentioned might sound plausible, none of them is a good explanation of the mass-extinction. She refutes all the theories and explains reason of her opposition.
First, the author claims that the decline of sea level could be the reason of extinction of ocean populations that lived in the shallows and the land species lived on the coast. However, the professor posits that animals are capable of adapting to environmental changes that happen gradually over a long time period. She states that it's true that there was fluctuation in the sea levels but it is not a good explanation since it happened over a long time period and not sudden enough to cause animals to disappear.
Second, the article asserts that the climate cooling that happened as a result of the Sulfur dioxide from volcanic activities might be the explanation of this phenomenon. On the other hand, the professor disputes this theory. She mentions that although it's true that Sulfur dioxde causes some climate cooling but this doesn't last long enough to cause animals to extinct. As she explains that the excess Sulfur dioxide will be eliminated from the atmosphere by combining to water and falling down on the earth with the rain.
Third, the reading provided another theory which states that an asteroid strike is a possible explanation. Conversely, the professor doesn't agree with this either. She mentions that many scientist don't agree with this theory since no asteroid crator that matches the period of extinction has been found. Although there is one crator that has been detected, but after being studied, it showed that it must have happened many years before the extinction. So obviously it has nothing to do with the extinction of these animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading discusses the different poss...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... explains reason of her opposition. First, the author claims that the declin...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nough to cause animals to disappear. Second, the article asserts that the cli...
^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...de causes some climate cooling but this doesnt last long enough to cause animals to ex...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing down on the earth with the rain. Third, the reading provided another theo...
^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... explanation. Conversely, the professor doesnt agree with this either. She mentions th...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun scientist seems to be countable; consider using: 'many scientists'.
Suggestion: many scientists
...ree with this either. She mentions that many scientist dont agree with this theory since no as...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ither. She mentions that many scientist dont agree with this theory since no asteroi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, third, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13522012579 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69869406306 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509433962264 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8098590835 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0625 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.