tpo 4 Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is warm or cold.
The lecturer and passage are both about the term of whether dinosaurs were endotherms or not. The passage supports the idea of the possibility of endotherms in dinosaurs by giving some pieces of evidence while the lecturer contradicts all of the passage’s views.
First of all, The author of the passage put forward the idea that the discovered dinosaur fossils in polar region indicated that the capability of preserving the temperate of dinosaurs in cold weather which matched the term of endotherms while the lecturer opposed this one by stating that there are plentiful fossils nowadays not only in the polar region. Moreover, normally when it was cold weather, dinosaurs would either migrate to the warmer place or hibernate as many modern reptiles.
Secondly, With the point which given by the author about the leg position that contributes the endotherms like dinosaurs’ legs which located beneath their body were likely to maintain the energy for running activity. But The lecturer’s point of view went against the passage by bringing another explanation about the location of legs that supported their weight of dinosaur’s body and had more advantages.
Finally , The author of the passage declared that bone structure which is Haversian canal had the connection with endotherms because it illustrated the rapid growth of dinosaur which was the indication of endotherms while the lecturer challenged this idea by claiming that dinosaur had the growth rings which showed the period of the growth of dinosaur and it made their temperature unstable. As a result, It wasn’t the characteristic of Endotherms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...evidence while the lecturer contradicts all of the passage's views. First of all, Th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s body and had more advantages. Finally , The author of the passage declared that...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36434108527 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93143523934 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531007751938 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.420715335 49.2860985944 224% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 173.0 110.228320801 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.25 21.698381199 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 7.06452816374 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1233271051 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578666577215 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332073925147 0.0662205650399 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788640809395 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120504022507 0.0443174109184 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.3589403974 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 53.8541721854 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.0289183223 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.