Some people prefer to spend time with one or two close friends. Others choose to spend time with a large number of friends. Compare the advantages of each choice. Which of these two ways of spending time do you prefer? Use specific reasons to support your answer.
It is apparent that many people in this world have different friendly qualities which mean not everyone is able to have the same number of friends. But It depends on many factors and chances that match you with your friends. So, That’s why there are so many various types of friend’s group. However, when it comes to doing some activities together. Someone may prefer spending their time with a number of friends while someone prefer spending with their few best friends. In this essay, I am going to illustrate both of their advantages and compare them as well.
First of all, For those who prefer spending their time with few best friend. They are likely to make a decision faster than being with a large group because of probably having the same preference or having a few choices that where to spend or what to do. So It won’t take much time to reach a consensus between people in the group. In contrast to a large group of friends, They have got a plenty of choices which may be partially different to decide and As a result, It causes taking more time to make an agreeable one. I will bring my sister’s case as an example. her friends which is a large group. She told me that her group had been discussing where to throw a party on a long holiday for 5 hours. Because they had totally different opinions. Finally, she decided to convince other people to go to the place that is an acceptable and cheap cost, after all, It nearly took almost 7 hours to find the best decision for them.
On the other hand, while someone prefers spending their time with a large group of friend. It also has some advantages. It can make you feel safer than a few people and you don’t have to be much cautious because those will help you protect from dangerous things. So You can fully enjoy spending your time with your friends what if you may face some problems With a number of your friends they could solve these problems more quickly than being with a few. It is said that the more brains are always than one. Moreover, It is another way to save your budget better than a few people. When you want to hang out somewhere which is exorbitant cost because of having many people to share their money to divide the payment.
To sum up, Either spending your time on a few friends who are your best friends or with a large number of friends has different benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es that match you with your friends. So, That's why there are so many variou...
^^
Line 1, column 440, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'prefers'.
Suggestion: prefers
... with a number of friends while someone prefer spending with their few best friends. ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Her
...ng my sister's case as an example. her friends which is a large group. She tol...
^^^
Line 3, column 713, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... a party on a long holiday for 5 hours. Because they had totally different opinions. Fi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...iends who are your best friends or with a large number of friends has different benefits.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, after all, in contrast, as a result, first of all, in contrast to, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50808314088 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30472723412 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473441108545 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 591.3 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1487390693 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8695652174 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8260869565 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26086956522 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352403781064 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103032883383 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100376921952 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24306982024 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445450968205 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.5 8.01818996416 81% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.