tpo 40
Both the reading and the lecture try to discuss about possibility of human presence on Venus, like Marc or the Moon. Although the reading presents that maintaining a human presence is not passible in Venus, the lecture repudiats and mentiones it is possible, also the speaker presents some reasons to support her idea.
At first, the reading declares that, atmospheric pressure at Venus is so high for human. In fact all spacecraft that have landed on Venus have been crushed by this extreme pressure within an hour. On the other hand, the lecture states that, some station has been found on Venus which it shows the pressure is not as high as the reading presents.
Secondly, the reading claims that, Venus has not any water supply and also oxygen which are urgent for human. The lecture, however, presents that, there are exist carbon dioxcid and acid which when they combine they produce water.
Finally, the reading states that, there are little sun light in Venus which is protect use of less solar power cell, So humans could not get electricity. But, the lecture claims that, the clouds are not thick so it is possible to reflect the sun light
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...ture, however, presents that, there are exist carbon dioxcid and acid which when they...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 80, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'protected'.
Suggestion: protected
... are little sun light in Venus which is protect use of less solar power cell, So humans...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 1373.03311258 70% => OK
No of words: 199.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80904522613 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21843218912 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562814070352 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1766688808 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325040161165 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153885966356 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653532887108 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19877041631 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603989561837 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.