TPO 40 - Integrated Writing Task
n this set materials, the reading passage state that human would not be living on the Venus for 3 main reasons. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading by providing different reasons (and examples).
First of all, the reading passage indicates that atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface is greater than the earth; hence, the human would not be living on the venues. In contrast, the problem of upper pressure can solve. If people go 50km up to the surface, the atmospheric pressure becomes equal as the surface.
Secondly, the reading argues that water and oxygen are not found in the Venus and only carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid are available. Conversely, what the lecturer believes is different. He points that we can produce water and oxygen by doing some chemical process on the CO2 and sulfuric acid.
Finally, according to the reading, the level of sunlight that reached Venus's surface is really low, because most of them are reflected by carbon dioxide of Venus's clouds. As a result, the human cannot produce their required electricity out of sunlight. However, the professor says that these clouds are not very thick, so some sunlight can reach Venus's surface and also scientists can utilize the reflection of sunlight to produce electricity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: N
n this set materials, the reading passage...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, in contrast, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11737089202 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50528327103 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596244131455 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8391123153 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0909090909 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8181818182 7.06452816374 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343240905228 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108851989042 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761175805175 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179544912202 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575083375402 0.0443174109184 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.