TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task
The lecture and the reading both discuss maintain a permanent human on Venus is impossible. While the reading proves this by stating some reasons, the lecture refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading claims the atmosphere pressure on Venus is greater than atmospheric pressure on Earth and is not proper for a human. However, the lecture argues that the atmospheric pressure is less in the high altitude. Furthermore, the professor states that in 20 kilometers up atmosphere the pressure is the same as Earth's pressure.
In addition, the reading makes the arguments that there is no water reservation on Venus surface and the water supply water and oxygen from Earth is not a practical idea. The lecture counters this point by stating carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide are essential chemical elements to make water. According to the professor, by producing water on Venus we can produce oxygen and it is practical.
Ultimately, the reading passage argues that little sunlight reaches to the Venus surface and the cloud above the Venus reflect back into space by this thick cloud. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing out that cloud that fills the atmosphere is not thick, but the station can use this sunlight that is reflected by the cloud. Moreover, the professor says, the station can produce electricity by this sunlight.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, moreover, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 224.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0625 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56671194412 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513392857143 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7932369751 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.090909091 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304955269242 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12271926301 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748749429196 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17542179816 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501842590024 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.