TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task
The lecture and the reading both discuss the fly ability of the Pterosaurs. While the reading states that pterosaurs have some weakness and cannot fly, the lecture refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading claims the pterosaurs are cold-blooded reptiles and this kind of animals cannot fly because they need to consume more energy. However, the lecture argues that fossils of Pterosaurs show this animal has a hair on their body which covers the whole of the pterosaurs’s body, and we know that warm-blooded animal has a hair on their body to protect the body heat. Furthermore, the professor says, the metabolism of the warm-blooded animal supply adequate energy to powered flight.
In addition, the reading makes the arguments that pterosaurs cannot fly due to their weight which was very huge. The lecture counters this point by stating pterosaurs have unusual light anatomy because they had hollow bones instead of solid bones. According to the professor, the hollow bones helps pterosaurs to have a low weight which assists the animal to consume less energy during the fly.
Ultimately, the reading passage argues that pterosaurs needed big and powerful muscle to fly but their leg's muscles were delicate. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing out there is some difference between birds and pterosaurs, for instance, birds use two legs for running and jumping but pterosaurs use four legs. Moreover, the professor says pterosaurs use four legs to push-off the ground to jump high and to walk.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in addition, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.156 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58153752636 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0320617491 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.181818182 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346637619779 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133996216208 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546478497245 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197385246215 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612863019196 0.0443174109184 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.