Both the reading material and the listening talk about the possibility of existence’s life on the Venus. The reading brings three reasons to refute this possibility due to the extreme and inhospitable situation. However, the professor in the listening disagrees with those reasons which are discussed in the reading and he refutes all of them.
Firstly, the reading passage believes that the atmospheric pressure at Venus’s surface is very higher than at Earth’s. Therefore, everything which lands on the Venus such as spacecraft and other stuff will be crushed. On the other hand, the professor rejects this reason. He says that by establishing a station above Venus’s surface, all problems would resolve. In the fifty high above Venus’s surface, the atmospheric pressure is equal to the Earth’s. Hence, nothing would crush in this circumstances.
Secondly, the reading material states that on Venus’s surface, there is no water, Oxygen and water vapor due to the existing high amount of Carbon dioxide and other chemical materials. Also, bringing water from Earth to Venus would not be practical and permanent. However, the professor refutes this reason. He says that people can make water from Carbon dioxide and other chemical materials. Therefore, there is no need to bring water from Earth to Venus.
Finally, the reading passage says that because of existing the thick cloud around the Venus which is a dense layer of Carbon dioxide below it, less sunlight reaches to the surface. Hence, people can not use the dollar cells for creating electricity. In contrast, the professor has a different sight. He believes that this cloud is not very thick. Actually, the cloud reflects some of the sunlight and filters the others. Therefore, people can use solar cells above and below the cloud for absorbing sunlight and getting electricity to power their machines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...h's. Hence, nothing would crush in this circumstances. Secondly, the readin...
^^^^
Line 7, column 377, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ery thick. Actually, the cloud reflects some of the sunlight and filters the others. Theref...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33887043189 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79599244589 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481727574751 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3020580601 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.35 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.05 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362087983497 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11129481249 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729177641157 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211424178714 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886187504566 0.0443174109184 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.1 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.