The issue both the reading and listening focus on is the possibility of establishing human life on Venus. While the author in the reading passage puts forth three main points indicating that there can be human presence on Venus, the listening assumes that the goal is to set up a floating station that is 50km from surface.
At the first point, the reading states that all the things that people may land on Venus are likely to be crashed due to the high atmospheric pressure on Mars, which is about 90 times greater than that on Earth. According to the listening, the atmospheric pressure is much lower when the station is 50 km far from the surface. Therefore, the pressure on Venus will be equal to that on Earth and there is no likelihood of properties being crushed by atmospheric pressure. This is a direct contradiction to what is indicated in the reading passage.
At the second point, the reading believes that there is no oxygen and water vapor on Venus. Therefore, they have to be transported from Earth to Venus which is extremely impractical. On the contrary, the listening argues that compounds like carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid, which is easily obtained in Venus atmosphere, can be used to produce water. This is an important point that is not considered by the author of the reading passage.
At the last point, the reading mentions that the amount of sunlight can reach the surface is very little due to the thick cloud and carbon dioxide layer. Accordingly, the lack of sunlight will result in the shortage of electricity for human to settle on Venus. However, the listening confirms that on the station, the cloud is not thick and human are able to receive considerable amount of sunlight. In addition, they can make use of it by collecting both the direct and reflected sunlight. This is yet another example of how the professor and the author of the reading contradict one another.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 10.4613686534 239% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 331.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78549848943 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62320910026 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483383685801 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0882298958 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377018758384 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128454352911 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073045171641 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234570249325 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510902658907 0.0443174109184 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.