TPO 41
In this set of materials, both the reading passage and the lecturer discuss the outcomes of creating new regulations for handling the coal ash. The reading passage firmly states that these regulations are unnecessary and might have negative repercussions. However, the professor casts doubt on these negative consequences.
Firstly, the lecturer articulates that the regulations which already exist strict the use of the liners in the new ponds that they are going to build; However, it is not sufficient and the new rules should be created for the necessity of the use of liners in the old ponds. Because the seeping chemicals are contaminating the goroundwater. On the other hand, the text contends that the effective renvironmental regulation already exist and the companies should use liner in every new pond which they build.
Moreover, the professor avers that creating the new rules wii not necessarily discourage the consumers from buying coal ash. For example, mercury is a toxic chemical which the government created strict handling rules for it in the past, but these regulations did not result in the discourage of the consumers. Conversely, the essay alleges that some analysts predict that creating the strict rules for storing the coal ash will dicourage the consumers to buy them.
Finally, the lectrur declares that it is true that by adopting the new rules the cost of disposal and handling will increase for the power companies, but the result worth the extra cost. besides, the price of the bills will only go up by 1 percent which is not very much. On the contrary, the article asserts the strict new rules would result in significant enhance in the costs of power companies and it finally leads to increase in the price of the electricity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of the use of liners in the old ponds. Because the seeping chemicals are contaminating...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 278, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...but these regulations did not result in the discourage of the consumers. Conversely, the essay...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 188, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Besides
...s, but the result worth the extra cost. besides, the price of the bills will only go up...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, for example, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09589041096 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73287456655 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486301369863 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8668850802 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4166666667 7.06452816374 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491725369163 0.272083759551 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16120479639 0.0996497079465 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886323290011 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26400707447 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505294026314 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.