TPO 41 integreated
n the reading, the author claims that regarding some people of power companies, establishing new and strict regulations to handle and store coal ash is are not necessary and might have negative results. However, finding all the ideas questionable and implausible, the lecturer totally repudiates this claim and presents some evidence to the contrary.
First, the reading passage asserts that there are some regulations which have good impacts on the environment like using liners for the pond and landfill. Conversely, the lecturer mentions that ongoing regulations are not enough due to the fact that the liner just uses for new landfills and ponds, while liners are not used by older landfills. Thus, the coal ash components go through the ground water and make it contaminated. Therefore, creating new and strict regulations are indispensable.
Second, the author declares that if the government makes new regulations for handling coal ash, the consumers will not have any tendency to buy recycled products of coal ash. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this reason by explaining that Mercury is a hazardous material that has some strict regulations for handling and storing. It has been recycled over 50 years without any concern reaction from its customers. As a result, new regulations would not have any negative consequences on consumers.
Finally, the reading states that decisive new regulations cause the cost of the handling coal ash increase. On the contrary, the speaker asserts that increasing costs have valuable consequences for people. Although the expense of handling and storing coal ash is about 15 billion dollar, the general public should pay just about one percent increase in their bill that is not much cost for having a clean environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: N
n the reading, the author claims that reg...
^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the government makes new regulations for handling coal ash, the consumers will no...
^^
Line 9, column 293, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...oal ash is about 15 billion dollar, the general public should pay just about one percent incre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'regarding', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'as a result', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.262820512821 0.261695866417 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.163461538462 0.158904122519 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0929487179487 0.0723426182421 128% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0480769230769 0.0435111971325 110% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0128205128205 0.0277247811725 46% => OK
Prepositions: 0.11858974359 0.128828473217 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0576923076923 0.0370669169778 156% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78257277241 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0128205128205 0.0208969081088 61% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.11858974359 0.128158765124 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0128205128205 0.0158828679856 81% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00961538461538 0.0114777025283 84% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1783.0 1645.83664459 108% => OK
No of words: 283.0 271.125827815 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.30035335689 6.08160592843 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.385159010601 0.374372842146 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.318021201413 0.287516216867 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.233215547703 0.187439937562 124% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.13074204947 0.113142543107 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78257277241 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572438162544 0.539623497131 106% => OK
Word variations: 59.9103129354 53.8517498576 111% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.7692307692 21.7502111507 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1107913038 49.3711431718 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.153846154 132.220823453 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 21.7502111507 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.07692307692 0.878197800319 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 53.5713509106 50.5018328374 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.95714285714 1.90840788429 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.666734942883 0.549887131256 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.103955227535 0.142949733639 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0563657833827 0.0787303798458 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.594759954121 0.631733273073 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166028393444 0.139662658121 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.295251768934 0.266732575781 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137977788156 0.103435571967 133% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.438436566381 0.414875509568 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0413312749307 0.0530846634433 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.487170889058 0.40443939384 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321109572853 0.0528353158467 61% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.