The reading passage and the lecture are both about glass materials in modern architecture which is may dangerous for wild birds; because the wild birds cannot distinguish between glass and open air. The author of the reading brings three solutions to prevent this problem. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article by providing three decent reasons.
Firstly, the author believes that architectures can use one-way glass instead of two-way glass. It means that wild birds cannot see inside the building. Therefore, they do not try to fly through it. This point is challenged by the lecturer. The professor says that one-way glass represents as a mirror for wild birds and they do not understand what the mirror is. Therefore, they see the picture of trees and the sky on the window and try to fly through it. Hence, it would not be different from two-way windows.
Secondly, the author states that architectures can provide some colorful thin lines or design on the outer side of the window. Therefore, the wild birds do not fly through it and also people inside the building would see outside, normally. This point is refuted by the lecturer. He states that these thin lines can be represented as a hole for birds; then, they want to fly through it. This solution would be practical if the lines become extremely small, but the inside of the building becomes dark for people.
Finally, the reading passage states that installing magnetic fields on the window can guide away birds from it; because they have the ability to recognize Earth’s magnetic fields when they travel. This point is rejected by the lecturer. He argues that birds use this ability just when they want to travel long distances such as migration from one country to another. Also, they do not use this ability for short travel inside the town; they use light and their eyes for short distances. Hence, this solution would not be practical.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hree solutions to prevent this problem. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 329.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89969604863 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39480503157 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480243161094 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 3.25607064018 430% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2593641515 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.45 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474899196095 0.272083759551 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127993977223 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827029645186 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276882168634 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068907443989 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.