TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task
Both the lecture and the reading discuss agnostids. While the reading states some different theories about agnostids lives, the lecture refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading claims the agnostids have been the free-swimming predators which were the strong swimmer and the active predators. However, the lecture argues that free-swimming predators had well-developed and large eyes that were suitable to hunt. Furthermore, the professor says the agnostids had tiny eyes and were completely blind. Agnostids, in order to be active predators, needed special sensory organs which there is not any evidence in the fossils.
In addition, the reading makes the arguments that agnostids were seafloor dwellers which have survived by scavenging dead organisms. The lecture counters this point by stating dwellers seafloor does not have the ability to move fast and far, they move slowly and stay on the originated locally. According to the professor, agnostids moved from one area to other areas very fast which is unusual for seafloor dwellers.
Ultimately, the reading passage asserts that agnostids were parasites which feeding off larger organisms and there are many modern species arthropods that called parasites. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing out that the population of the parasites were not very large and were limit. Moreover, the professor says the agnostids population were large and does not seem were parasites.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...f the parasites were not very large and were limit. Moreover, the professor says the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'limited'.
Suggestion: limited
... parasites were not very large and were limit. Moreover, the professor says the agnos...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50666666667 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63291979875 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7408522979 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386662063204 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152458415846 0.0996497079465 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908986804209 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224698563711 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795673300159 0.0443174109184 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.