The reading passage and the lecture both talks about the Agnostids whether it is a primitive arthropods or not. The author in the passage states that some paleontologist were not able to find out the agnostids are primitive arthopods or not but there are several supporting theories which clearly Shows that Agnostids living behavior and which supports that they are primituve arthropods and provide three supporting theories however, the professor explains that the theories did not clearly support whether it is primitive arthropods or not and refutes each of the authors reasons.
First, the author mention that arthropods may be a free swimmer because other types of primitive arthropods were also strong swimmer but the professor refutes the claim by saying that it is not true that arthropods can be a free swimmer because arthropods has not develop a eyes and Without eyes it is not possible to swim. According to him, other types of arthropods have tiny pores eyes but the arthropods do not have eyes and other sense organ which helps to swim.
Second, the authors posits that arthropods may have dweller in sea floor like other types of primitive arthropods do. On the contrary, the professor defines that other move slowly and spread into the small area. Other types of arthropods only occupy the small geography below the Agnostids move from one distance to others and also able to move multiple geography of area faster. So, it is highly unusual to compare this with totally different dwellers.
Third, the author says that there is a possibility about the agnostids may be a parasites because there are many modern arthropods species which is exist as a parasites like fleas, ticks and mites. But, the professor rebuts by saying that parasites population is not larger And they have a short life spam but the agnostids population is very high and it has also in a great size. It does not rely on theories that they were a parasites.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'arthropod'?
Suggestion: arthropod
...the Agnostids whether it is a primitive arthropods or not. The author in the passage state...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'developed'.
Suggestion: developed
...free swimmer because arthropods has not develop a eyes and Without eyes it is not possi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...mmer because arthropods has not develop a eyes and Without eyes it is not possibl...
^
Line 6, column 79, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a parasite' or simply 'parasites'?
Suggestion: a parasite; parasites
... possibility about the agnostids may be a parasites because there are many modern arthropod...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 121, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arthropods'' or 'arthropod's'?
Suggestion: arthropods'; arthropod's
...parasites because there are many modern arthropods species which is exist as a parasites l...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 149, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...many modern arthropods species which is exist as a parasites like fleas, ticks and mi...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 240, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parasites'' or 'parasite's'?
Suggestion: parasites'; parasite's
...ut, the professor rebuts by saying that parasites population is not larger And they have ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 426, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a parasite' or simply 'parasites'?
Suggestion: a parasite; parasites
...oes not rely on theories that they were a parasites.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, well, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 7.30242825607 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 329.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93617021277 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53251141457 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452887537994 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 116.499920193 49.2860985944 236% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 147.636363636 110.228320801 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9090909091 21.698381199 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430110056021 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161755498063 0.0996497079465 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612631753889 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255610586105 0.162205337803 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309532306532 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.7273730684 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.