tpo 44
The reading claims that the coins which were found in one of the Native American historical site do not have any archaeological value and provides three reasons of support. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this ideas and provides several points to refute them all.
First the author argues that the large distance between Maine and North American settlement clearly depicts that these two group of people did not have any connection with each other. Conversely, the lecturer casts doubt on this idea by stating that other objects which were found in the archaeological site clearly highlighted the relationships of these two settlements.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that Norse did not bring their coins with each other because no coin was found on the Canadian sites that they lived in them. In contrast, the professor underlines the fact that although these people know they will not live in this place prominently, they were probable pack their precious things such as their coins and they brought them back by their self , when they wanted to come back to their original home.
Finally, the reading asserts that the Norse who traveled to North America would probable know they did not need their coins and they could not buy anything with them. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that these coins were attractive objects for the North American people because they could make different ornaments with them. So, as long as native people valued these coins, they could utilize them for different purposes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...t. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this ideas and provides several points to re...
^^^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...and they brought them back by their self , when they wanted to come back to their ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.205035971223 0.261695866417 78% => OK
Verbs: 0.161870503597 0.158904122519 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0863309352518 0.0723426182421 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0611510791367 0.0435111971325 141% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0755395683453 0.0277247811725 272% => OK
Prepositions: 0.129496402878 0.128828473217 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0179856115108 0.0370669169778 49% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.3607333882 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0179856115108 0.0208969081088 86% => OK
Particles: 0.00359712230216 0.00154638098197 233% => OK
Determiners: 0.125899280576 0.128158765124 98% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0179856115108 0.0158828679856 113% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0143884892086 0.0114777025283 125% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1564.0 1645.83664459 95% => OK
No of words: 260.0 271.125827815 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01538461538 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.292307692308 0.374372842146 78% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.230769230769 0.287516216867 80% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.153846153846 0.187439937562 82% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0807692307692 0.113142543107 71% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3607333882 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519230769231 0.539623497131 96% => OK
Word variations: 49.9073242594 53.8517498576 93% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 28.8888888889 21.7502111507 133% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0955346754 49.3711431718 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.777777778 132.220823453 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8888888889 21.7502111507 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.11111111111 0.878197800319 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 51.9658119658 50.5018328374 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.18072289157 1.90840788429 62% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.627217130233 0.549887131256 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.197827116847 0.142949733639 138% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0788164120871 0.0787303798458 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.701129520851 0.631733273073 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.111531051741 0.139662658121 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.324112440303 0.266732575781 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12958333031 0.103435571967 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.395278720638 0.414875509568 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0849058334109 0.0530846634433 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.438827045046 0.40443939384 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00942643615799 0.0528353158467 18% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.