tpo 44
The author enumerates some possible reason for silver coins, which they are not genuine, are discovered in North America. The lecture, however, refutes the aforementioned assertion by providing some counterclaims, and she firmly believes that the supports are not compelling.
First, the reading asserts that due to there is the great distance between North settlement to where coins are found. Nevertheless, the professor opposes the statement by mentioning other aspects of this issue. She argues that in the same place not only some coins are observed, but also some other objects are discovered. In addition, when people went to travel, they had brought some interesting objects to the main site in North America. All in all, although that place was far from America, people could easily transfer its.
Second, the author claims that there are no other coins that are found in North America. On the contrary, the speaker concedes the point that some coins have taken to Europe by people who had traveled. In fact, the coins are transferred between some states.
Third, according to the reading, even though coins are valuable today, the people who had traveled think that they are useless. Conversely, the lecturer rejects that the coin was very appealing because they were beautiful. Moreover, although people do not use them, in the same way, today, they could benefit from them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, third, in addition, in fact, on the contrary, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18222222222 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50702125152 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.03688835 49.2860985944 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.6923076923 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3076923077 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06452816374 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385566888599 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136721099236 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726215086236 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22520143017 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880497595059 0.0443174109184 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.