Although the author explains three main hypotheses to prove that European silver coin, found at the site of Maine in the United States, is fake and it is brought by someone else recently to deceive public, the professor finds them dubious and brings up three counterclaims to refute them all.
Firstly, the author mentions the great distance that they have been brought which is too far, from the site of eastern Canadian called Norse. The professor, however, gainsays this idea and states that there are numerous objects that were brought from large distances. In addition, North American used to travel remote areas because they were interested in going new regions. Thus, they could have traveled this areas as well and brought this coins back with themselves.
Furthermore, the author asserts that why just one coin was found there. In contrast, the professor believes that the North American settlements were always on move and they might have packed all their silvers to Europe and just one left behind.
Eventually, the author claims that these coins must have been useless for them since they were not their currency.
Conversely, the speaker holds the view that North American people always valued these objects as precious things and utilized them as neckless or decorative tools. Moreover, as they were interested in invaluable materials, silver coins must have been used as trade goods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...regions. Thus, they could have traveled this areas as well and brought this coins ba...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, so, thus, well, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18859649123 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33377436143 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609649122807 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8714701702 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.3 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386881496427 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14450318277 0.0996497079465 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560067728774 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205532571951 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236760049231 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.