TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to

Both the reading and the passage discuss the European silver coins related to the eleventh century discovered in the Main state in the United States which people believe belonged to the "Norse" a group of European explorers that traveled to America about one thousand years ago. The author of the passage believes that these coins are historical fake and recently placed there by someone and proposes three reasons for this assertion. However, the professor in the lecture opposes to the passage and refuses all the reasons.
At first, the passage states that the native people that were Norse had lived far from the location were the coins found, hence, the coins are historical fake. On the other hand, the professor acclaims that in that place many other objects have found and the native people could travel long distances to put the objects and coins there, therefore, the coins are not fake.
Second, the passage asserts that no other coins have found in the Canadian site that Norse people were lived and concludes that Norse people did not bring any coins to North America, hence, the coins are not historical. The professor casts doubt in this point and states some people traveled to Europe and come back there, therefore, they could bring the coins.
Third, the author acclaims that silver coins were useful in Europe, not in North America. The professor challenges this point and illustrates that these coins were beautiful and the native Americans may collect them for their beauty and maybe trade with them, hence the coins can be historically real coins.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02661596958 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27984740144 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505703422053 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.7913654122 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.888888889 110.228320801 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2222222222 21.698381199 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517420524104 0.272083759551 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.216823602379 0.0996497079465 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124094221629 0.0662205650399 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32339066342 0.162205337803 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510429261186 0.0443174109184 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.