The reading passage proposes that a coin that has been found in North America is a fake evidence. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on this hypothesis and does not validate its reasons. He brings up some pieces of evidence which contradict them.
First off, the passage states that the location of discovery is far from other sites that showing the presence of Norse. However, the professor says that this reason is highly questionable due to the fact that other materials which were used by the Norse have been found in various places. He brings up the fact that the Norse usually traveled a great distance and obtained the object from far back to their mainland. So, it is possible that their material can be found in many places.
Furthermore, the author asserts that no other coins have been found where the Norse inhabited. On the other hand, the lecturer shares the idea that this point is not to be taken seriously by underlining the fact that it is possible when the European came to Canda, the brought the coins in the packs and after a while when they wanted to return packed up the coins and came back to Europe.
Finally, The reading holds the view that the Norse understood that silver coins are useless for them in North America where they did not recognize it as money. Conversely, the professor refutes this idea because he believes that silver was very appealing form them and they used it for jewelry and they traded by it. So, they knew the worth of the silver clearly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...poses that a coin that has been found in North America is a fake evidence. Howeve...
^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urn packed up the coins and came back to Europe. Finally, The reading holds th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1247.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67041198502 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25404074657 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516853932584 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.917046935 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.916666667 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374507104284 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129606564009 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903376160125 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208116082723 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298701531354 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.