TPO 44 - Integrated Writing Task
Actually, both the passage and the lecturer comment about the silvers coins which have been found in North America. Although the passage brings three Hypothesizes for proving the thought that the coins are fake and they are not a genuine piece of historical evidence which is taken, the lecturer puts those theories under question. According to the lecture, none of the proofs are convincing.
First, as illustrated by the passage, Norse traveled in another part od continent where is far from where the silver coins have been discovered; therefore, they aren't the original European coins. The passage; however, refutes the idea by emphasizing the fact that the explorers were used to traveling; hence, it is logical that they might be travel to North America as well, although it located far from the center of the area where they settled.
Next, as declared in the article, considering the fact that the mentioned coins haven't been explored in Eastern Canada where was the hub of the Norse's dwelling the found coins is different; nonetheless, the professor dismisses the claim by indicating the statement that people presumably took the coins as well as other valuable things back to Europe.
Finally, the passage expresses that albeit the coins were worthwhile for the European, the North American people weren't aware of the value of them; thus, there aren't any rational reasons to support the fact that they aren't fake; never the less, the speaker doesn't reinforce the idea by adding the fact that the coins ware attractive enough that encouraged people to use them as a jewelry or for constructing neckless
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...s have been discovered; therefore, they arent the original European coins. The passag...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 81, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...ering the fact that the mentioned coins havent been explored in Eastern Canada where w...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as well as other valuable things back to Europe. Finally, the passage expres...
^^
Line 13, column 114, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...the European, the North American people werent aware of the value of them; thus, there...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 161, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...aware of the value of them; thus, there arent any rational reasons to support the fac...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 218, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...l reasons to support the fact that they arent fake; never the less, the speaker doesn...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 258, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...arent fake; never the less, the speaker doesnt reinforce the idea by adding the fact t...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 312, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'coins'' or 'coin's'?
Suggestion: coins'; coin's
...ce the idea by adding the fact that the coins ware attractive enough that encouraged ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13909774436 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49839396658 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575187969925 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 21.2450331126 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 115.54096367 49.2860985944 234% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 195.285714286 110.228320801 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.0 21.698381199 175% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.7142857143 7.06452816374 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363543449294 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15815366633 0.0996497079465 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857956131062 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208889734587 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312147188149 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.8 13.3589403974 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 53.8541721854 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.0289183223 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.498013245 164% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.