The reading and the lecture are both arguing about storing patients' medical records in electronic databases has several advantages over traditional paper-based record keeping. The author of the reading believes that the electronic databases are more significant that the paper data records. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made by the article. She thinks that electronic records are less significant than paper data.
First, the author claims that the electronic database system is can save a lot of money since, unlike the paper database, there is not needed for any space to save the data. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She says that doctors still saving the paper database even when they insert all the information in the computers for emergency pack up, so they still need space to save the paper form which means there is no reducing in the cost.
A second controversial issue is that the author argues that the electric database can reduce the error in the system. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer. She suggests that doctors still using the pen a paper to take the information for the patients. He elaborates on this by mentioning that stuff that enters the information to the system, so poor handwriting or even disability to read doctors' handwriting still lead to some errors in the system
Finally, the author mentions that the electronic database might be helping a medical researcher to get the data so easily and so fast. The lecturer, on the other hand, feels that is totally wrong. She puts forth the idea that it is still so difficult to access the system due to the privacy law in the USA. Furthermore, she says that anyone wants to access the data have to follow restricted and complicated procedures and a lot of permissions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture are both arg...
^^^
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ignificant that the paper data records. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are less significant than paper data. First, the author claims that the electr...
^^^^
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... money since, unlike the paper database, there is not needed for any space to sav...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eans there is no reducing in the cost. A second controversial issue is that the...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...till lead to some errors in the system Finally, the author mentions that the el...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, so, still, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89700996678 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61636291592 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508305647841 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.604278847 49.2860985944 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403549097076 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128750001427 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140547544693 0.0662205650399 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233566651588 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144424962271 0.0443174109184 326% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.