TPO 46-Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the reading and the listening discuss properties of electronic medical record system. The auothor believes that this method of storing information about patients has some significant advantages such as cutting costs, preventing human errors, and helping research. The lecturer, however, casts doubt on the claims made in the passage. She states that the reasons stated by the author are incorrect.
First of all, the author points out that electronic method of storing documents is more economical, since electronic medical records take up no physical space. This point is challenged by the professor. She says that even doctors who adopted the electronic method, not only store the information on computers but also keep paper documents as a back up for legal reasons.
Secondly, the author contends that electronic records can help to minimize the possibility of human mistake such as illegible writing and improper transcription. The lecturer rebut this argument. She mentions that doctor write the prescription on paper and later the staff will store it in computer, as a result, the electronic system of recording is not able to remove human error.
Finally, it is stated in the reading that this electronic method can help reasearchers. The article establishes that this system can aid medical scientists by allowing them to gather abundant amounts of data from lots of patients. The professor, on the other hand, points that this is hard for researchers to access this information. She elaborates on this by mentioning that as a censequence of privacy laws, scientists have to follow complex procedure to be allowed to access the data and these permissions are not easily granted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'rebuts'.
Suggestion: rebuts
...nd improper transcription. The lecturer rebut this argument. She mentions that doctor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3037037037 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82177502046 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.378867444 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.285714286 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412729001278 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122170631609 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10132123931 0.0662205650399 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241546373847 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466391464224 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.