tpo 48
The reading and lecture discuss three solutions for preventing the decline in frogs population. The passage claims that shrink in frog population can be prevented by applying three methods. However, the lecturer brings up three reasons to rebuts all dubious ideas presented in the passage and states that none of these three solutions are practical for slowing down reduction in the number of frogs.
First of all, the writer holds the view that strict laws should be set to limit using pesticides which are harmful to frogs. In contrast, the speaker refutes this idea and underlines the fact that this theory is not economically practical. In fact, farmers who live near frog habitats have to follow strict laws for using pesticides, so they lose more crops. Therefore, they will face severe difficulties which limit them from competition with other farmers.
Second of all, the author contends that special treatments protect frogs from fungs which put frogs' life in danger. However, the lecture contradicts this contention and asserts that these treatments are expensive and complicated. She brings up two reasons for supporting this claim. First, this treatment should be applied individually for each frog. If they were applied in large scale, would be extremely difficult. Moreover, this special treatment should be applied for each new generation, since they are offsprings. These two supports show how this solution is not practical.
Finally, the writer states that protecting frogs habitat from human activities which affect on frogs eggs helps to slow down the reduction in forgs population. On the contrary, the speaker rebuts this statements and stresses that this solution does not save frog from shrinking. As a matter of fact, global warming applies in all around the world which puts the forgs population in danger. Accordingly, protecting frogs' habitats from human activities can not protect this area from global warming.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...ally, the writer states that protecting frogs habitat from human activities which aff...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ogs habitat from human activities which affect on frogs eggs helps to slow down the reduc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...on. On the contrary, the speaker rebuts this statements and stresses that this solut...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'as a matter of fact', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248538011696 0.261695866417 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.175438596491 0.158904122519 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0730994152047 0.0723426182421 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0409356725146 0.0435111971325 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0175438596491 0.0277247811725 63% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134502923977 0.128828473217 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0497076023392 0.0370669169778 134% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58222023836 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0146198830409 0.0208969081088 70% => OK
Particles: 0.0116959064327 0.00154638098197 756% => OK
Determiners: 0.108187134503 0.128158765124 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0204678362573 0.0158828679856 129% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0204678362573 0.0114777025283 178% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1944.0 1645.83664459 118% => OK
No of words: 308.0 271.125827815 114% => OK
Chars per words: 6.31168831169 6.08160592843 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.392857142857 0.374372842146 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.288961038961 0.287516216867 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.194805194805 0.187439937562 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.146103896104 0.113142543107 129% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58222023836 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.539623497131 101% => OK
Word variations: 56.9864943061 53.8517498576 106% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0529801325 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.1111111111 21.7502111507 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.586965293 49.3711431718 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 132.220823453 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 21.7502111507 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.878197800319 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 46.0072150072 50.5018328374 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.85 1.90840788429 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.484056083256 0.549887131256 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.110908626667 0.142949733639 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0652488795947 0.0787303798458 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.489015825787 0.631733273073 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.138591326954 0.139662658121 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169922353301 0.266732575781 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885103055492 0.103435571967 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.262777091433 0.414875509568 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00983948105875 0.0530846634433 19% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33536309022 0.40443939384 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553119190843 0.0528353158467 105% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.