TPO 48
The passage concerns about declining population of frogs and therefore provides three solution for this decline to be stopped. On the other hand the lecturer, points out that these solutions are not practical and she further expresses her counterclaims to support her idea.
First, the passage mentions that one of the main reasons for frog population decline is pesticde usage in the nearby farms. Hence auther proposes pecticede usage prohobition in farms which are near the frogs' habitats. In contray, the lecturer underlines the fact that pesticide prohobition is not economical and fair due to decrease in farmers' yield in crops and competing potential.
Second, the passage counts fungus as a major criteria in the frogs' population decline and consequently proposes large scale treatment of funges in frogs' population. Conversly, the lecturer mentions that this treatment must be applied individualy and hence, it will be too difficult and expensive. Additionally the lecturer reminds that this treatment is not a permenent cure which means it must also be further applied for next generations.
Finally, the solution of water supplies preservation which is proposed by passage to decrease the population decline pace is also refuted by lecturer. She brings up the idea that the main threat and cause for decline of frogs' watery habitats is not human activities but is global warming. Consequently she mentions that global warming is the major factor in frogs' habitat decrease and it happens anyway.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... is pesticde usage in the nearby farms. Hence auther proposes pecticede usage prohobi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...d, the passage counts fungus as a major criteria in the frogs population decline and con...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...ounts fungus as a major criteria in the frogs population decline and consequently pro...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...it will be too difficult and expensive. Additionally the lecturer reminds that this treatmen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 290, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...human activities but is global warming. Consequently she mentions that global warming is the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, consequently, finally, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36554621849 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77849299143 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546218487395 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.4418142198 49.2860985944 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.090909091 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30639791804 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125456823703 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888485116434 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187338382193 0.162205337803 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375334303421 0.0443174109184 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.