TPO 48
In this set of materials, both the lecturer and the readin passage discuss the recent decline in the numbers of frog species. The reading passage puts forward three methods for solving this problem; however, the professor casts doubt on these three methods and mentions they are not practical.
Firstly, the article alleges that the pesricides are a crucial factor in the extinction of some frog species and the governments should ban the permit of pesticides near the frogs habitats. On the other hand, the lecturer articulates that reducing in the utilizing of the pesticides is not economically fair for some farmers because the farmers who should follow this rule cannot compete with other farmers in the sale of their products.
Moreover, the text contends that some fungus are a key factor in the decline of frogs by bringing about thickening of their skin which leads to death of the frogs due to dehydration. the article proposes the use of antifugal medication for cure of the frogs. Nevertheless, the professor avers that the treats should apply to every individual frog which is actually hard. Besides, the disease can be transfer to frogs’ offspring which makes the treatment complicated and expensive.
Finally, the essay asserts that the frogs are dependent on wetland habitats and many human activities threatend their habitats. Thus, if those habitats will be protected, many of the frogs will be subsisted. Conversely, the professor declares that this solution will not work out, because the main problem is global warming and the human being should solve the global warming issue and the wetlands draining has nothing to do with human's water use.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... death of the frogs due to dehydration. the article proposes the use of antifugal m...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, conversely, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20588235294 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58708352966 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555147058824 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3888506652 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.727272727 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401027936002 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149192172601 0.0996497079465 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755696530599 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219716153231 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768575002211 0.0443174109184 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.