The passage and the lecture debate on the three methods that have been proposed to help solve the problem of the decrease trend in frog populations. The passage points out that people should issue a law that prohibits the farmers from using pesticides, apply treatments to prevent infection of fungi, cut down the use of excessive water. However, the lecture is not for that.
To begin with, the passage contends that pesticides can be harmful of frogs and thus farmers whose farmlands are near frog habitats are not allowed to use pesticides. By contrast, the lecture disagrees. Because it is not ecological and not fair. Especially, it is not fair for farmers to stay competition. If the government has strict regulation on the use of pesticides, whose farmlands near frog habitats will loss more crops and thus will have less yield compared with others, which is really unfair.
What is more, the passage argues that antifungal medication and treatments can be applied to prevent infection of fungi, which is contradicted by the lecture. The lecture holds the view that the population is really a large scale and each area needs treatment, which cost a lot to achieve that. What is worse, the treatments cannot pass on to others, which will require people to apply this again and again to each generation.
Finally, according to the passage, if the water habitats such as lakes and marshes were better protected from excessive water use, frogs' population would recover. However, the lecture disagrees with that because it is the global warming that threatens the natural habitats. To be honest, human misconduct is not the major reason of the decline of natural habitats. As a consequence, though human stop using excessive water, it may not save the frog populations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, really, so, thus, such as, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05084745763 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63032936661 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515254237288 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1419064602 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406400614839 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119172109041 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114326855034 0.0662205650399 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239537154091 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119735203929 0.0443174109184 270% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.