TPO 49 - Integrated writing

Essay topics:

TPO 49 - Integrated writing

The main idea of both the passage and the talk is whether humpback whales use stars for their long distances migration or not. In the text, the author claims that there are some evidence in this regard. The lecturer challenges all the mentioned answers and believes none of this arguments is convincing.

Firstly, the author states that humpback whales' brain are capable to use stars for navigation since these animals seem to be high intelligent. Conversely, the lecturer says that other animals such as duck utilize stars for navigation but none of these animals is high intelligent. Thus, it can be easily concluded that the brain complexity could not guarantee using stars for navigation.

Moreover, the author asserts that some animals such as humpback rely on external signs such as starts to migrate in straight lines. On the contrary, the speaker believes that although numerous animals like humpback whale implement external objects for navigation, this animal use magnetic field for find its way because this animal has a specific organ on its brain that provide this opportunity for it.

Eventually, the reading passage holds the opinion that humpback whale look at stars some times by having a special behavior which is known as spy-hopping. The lecturer, however, points out that although the spy-hopping is rare among animals, they use this behavior for other purposes such as for hunting. For example, shark do this behavior to catch its prey. Moreover, humpback whale do this behavior in day time rather than night. Therefore, the mentioned behavior cannot be compelling evidence for using a star for navigation.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... mentioned answers and believes none of this arguments is convincing. Firstly, th...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as for, for example, such as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19318181818 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56824885941 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549242424242 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1601992954 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.461538462 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.472691630766 0.272083759551 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171627929194 0.0996497079465 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815325068949 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286387464079 0.162205337803 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616079439272 0.0443174109184 139% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.