TPO 49 - Integrated writing
In this set materials, the reading passage state that humpback whales are migration along distance, and they use stats to find their ways. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading points by providing different reasons (and examples).
First of all, the reading passage indicates that the humpback whales have a well-developed brain and they are intelligence; therefore, they are able to find their ways by stars. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this view by mentioning that the ability to finding ways by stars does not depend on the intelligence of animals. As we know, most birds also migrate such as ducks. Ducks do not have a well-developed brain and having an average cognitive ability. Also, these animals born with an ability that finding their ways with stars.
Second, the reading argues that humpback whales migrate in straight lines. For maintaining in straight lines, they need external force or objects, and they use stars for migrating in the straight line; conversely, what the speaker believes is different. She points that animals that migrate in straight lines use external force such as earth magnetic. Also, the humpback whales body has biomagnified in their brains that use for finding their ways with the Earth magnetic field. This force that animals use is earth magnetic, not stars.
Finally, according to the reading, the humpback whales have some behaviour such as the spy-hopping; thus, they see the star to find their ways. However, the professor claims that other animals have the same behaviour as the humpback whales such as sharks. Sharks do not migrate, but they use spy-hopping for finding and catching prey. Furthermore, the humpback whales spy-hopping during the day, but during the day sky does not have a star that they can find their ways.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15824915825 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53895273523 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474747474747 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9622714142 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5625 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423674641989 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15350135133 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719451036688 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261659737582 0.162205337803 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690322843988 0.0443174109184 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.