The reading and the lecture are both about colonization in asteroids. The author feels that this process would have several benefits. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. She is of the opinion that these ways are not practical and have some downsides.
To begin with, the author argues that because of low gravity it would be much easier while landing and taking off. The article mentions that spaceship would be able to carry more equipment and would use less fuel. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that low gravity may have some certain risks. Additionally, she says that low gravity may affect people on asteroids to lose muscle mass and bone density, and astronauts would suffer from some health risks.
Secondly, the writer suggests that asteroids are valuable mineral sources that are rare in Earth. In the article, it is said that because these are profitable, some businesses can sponsor these trips to gain more. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that great amount of materials can reduce the profits because prices would not be same. She elaborates on this by bringing up the point that great amount of rich minerals would increase supply, lowering market prices.
Finally, the author posits that asteroids are easy to reach. Moreover, it is stated in the article that they periodically come within close distance with Earth, closer than Moon. In contrast, the lecturer’s position is that returning to Earth may not be so easy as going to because asteroids sometimes can be far away as Mars. She notes that orbits of asteroids are not periodic, so asteroids can be closer to Earth and can move away from Earth in a same orbital period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...is process would have several benefits. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97569444444 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47081488891 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548611111111 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6478353633 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2941176471 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0580199274605 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0210949191399 0.0996497079465 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248965353911 0.0662205650399 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0348942189135 0.162205337803 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232949189677 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.