TPO 54
The reading and the lecture are both commenting of options for redusing salinity of the salton sea. Thr author provides three solutions for the problem. The lecturer, however, finds them dubious and casts doubt on the solutions proposed by teh reading passage.
According to the reading, the salinity of the sea can be decreased by direct removal of salt. Conversely, this specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that the solid matirials left behind from evaporation of sea water can cause other harful pollutions in the region. Additionally, she points out that the remains of evaporation can produce seleniom that is great harmful element for humans and other creatures.
Further, the reading passage holds the view that adding water from teh Pacific Ocean can help to dilute the salt in the Saltone Sea. On the contrary, the lecturer asserts that the government does not have enough resouces to digging tunels and chanels from the ocean to the area.Additionally, she points out that the distance between the lake and the ocean is to far and demand a lots of money to make facilities.
Finallym the author posits that building walls and dividing the lake to seprate sections can help to redusing the salinity. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is that the location of the lake is geologicaly active and strong earthguiecs hapens frequentaly. She nots that with first strong earthquiec walls are faile down and the salty waters leak to other sections and make them salty again.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture are both com...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tions proposed by teh reading passage. According to the reading, the salinity o...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lement for humans and other creatures. Further, the reading passage holds the v...
^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Additionally
... and chanels from the ocean to the area.Additionally, she points out that the distance betw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the ocean to the area.Additionally, she points out that the distance between the...
^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: THE_NN_AND_THE_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'are'?
Suggestion: are
...distance between the lake and the ocean is to far and demand a lots of money to ma...
^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...lake and the ocean is to far and demand a lots of money to make facilities. Finall...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd a lots of money to make facilities. Finallym the author posits that building...
^^^
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...redusing the salinity. In contrast, the lecturers stance is that the location of the lake...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, however, if, so, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0564516129 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63639380983 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556451612903 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3555041678 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259069821716 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814261185214 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542029708163 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138307148567 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587204170259 0.0443174109184 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.