TPO 53
The reading and the lecture are both about taxing on unhealthy products like smoking and unhealthy foods. The author of the article provides three benefits of taxing cigarettes and unhealthy foods that customers need to pay it. The lecturer, however, finds the dubious and casts doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
According to the reading, in the way of taxing people are encouraged to leave their unhealthy habits. The article mention that high taxing on cigarettes and unhealthy foods lead people to decrease their usage of those products. Conversely, This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that by increasing the tax on cigarettes people are attended to by cheap ones, as a result, the cheaper cigarettes cause greater harm to the people. Additionally, she points out that people who love and buy unhealthy foods keep eating those, and the higher tax causes them to spend more money, therefore they do not have enough money to buy healthy ones.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that the high taxes of those kinds of products is fair. In the article, it is said that people who consume cigarette or trash foods pay their future health care costs by high taxing. On the contrary, the lecturer asserts that high taxing is not fair for all consumers with different incomes. People with higher incomes do not face any problem with the cost of products and still buying products in the same amount, but on the other hand, people with lower incomes deal with financial problems because of higher taxing.
Finally, the author posits that increasing the revenue for the government from higher taxing on harmful products, helps the government to spend more money on all projects which are useful to all population. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is that higher incomes from taxing unhealthy products increase the dependency of the government on those taxes. Thus the government does not make rules to reduce the consuming those products. For example, smoking is forbidden in some outdoor places like parks. If the government has great income from taxing from cigarettes, It would not ban smoking in all outdoor public places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture are both abo...
^^^
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hy foods that customers need to pay it. The lecturer, however, finds the dubious an...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asons proposed by the reading passage. According to the reading, in the way of ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have enough money to buy healthy ones. Furthermore, the reading passage holds t...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ial problems because of higher taxing. Finally, the author posits that increasi...
^^^
Line 4, column 227, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...ful to all population. In contrast, the lecturers stance is that higher incomes from taxi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 356, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...dency of the government on those taxes. Thus the government does not make rules to r...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 30.3222958057 175% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1373.03311258 133% => OK
No of words: 361.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06371191136 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45985875059 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512465373961 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9216272333 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.529411765 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2352941176 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.496009477879 0.272083759551 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165165142062 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906614989088 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292025974934 0.162205337803 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592370362302 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.