TPO 54
The reading states that there are ways to improve the situation of a salty lake. However, the professor in the lecture says that although it is great to do so but the given solutions are not viable.
For example, the reading proposes that some special facility can be used to desalinate the lake. As mentioned, the process includes pumping water from lake, heating it, and cooling the vapor down to produce salt-free water. However, the professor asserts that using such a process will have consequences. According to the lecturer, there might be chemicals other than salt in the solid metrial remained from heating which can cause damage to people. For example, celenium is a material that can be found in the remnants and can be toxic for the people who breath it. Therefore, implementing special devices to desalinate lake water can result in health issues.
As an another example, the reading states that the lake water can be diluted by entering the ocean water to it. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this solution by stating that executing this plan needs constructing pipelines or canals. In fact, the local government has not enough resources to sponsor these projects. What is more, there is a 100 km distance between the ocean and the lake, hence, the project will be a huge one and thus it will require a lot of money that the local government, probably, cannot afford.
Also, the reading discusses dividing the lake by means of walls and let the rivers discharge only into the main division of it. However, the professor declares that such a solution will not work for long period of time because the region is prone to natural accidents such as earthquake that can destroy the walls, and lead to different divisions of lake be mixed again.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut the given solutions are not viable. For example, the reading proposes that s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ake water can result in health issues. As an another example, the reading state...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'an example' or 'another example'.
Suggestion: an example; another example
...r can result in health issues. As an another example, the reading states that the lake water...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... government, probably, cannot afford. Also, the reading discusses dividing the...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 210, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... such a solution will not work for long period of time because the region is prone to natural ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, in fact, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83774834437 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46582047241 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562913907285 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8578821595 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.357142857 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.