The reading and lecture are both about the great leader which is called Spartacus. The author of the reading presents three theories about the historical background of Spartacus's motivation to win that battle. The lecturer disputes the all claims made in the article. Her position is that none of them is showing represent the truth.
According to the reading, Spartacus had been forced to leave far away from Rome. The article mentions his aim for that fight was just to go back home. The lecturer challenges this argument. She claims that returning home overseas was not the only goal. Additionally, she points out that even though they won he rejected to return because his motivation was revenge and take all wealth of Rome.
Secondly, the author suggests Spartacus's success in battle made him a hero in people's eyes. In the article, it said that the Roman army was powerful and greatly financed compared with Spartacus's army however, Spartacus could manage the army brilliantly. The lecturer, however, asserts that Spartacus may have won a few little battles but that does not mean that he was a military genius. She goes on to say that Romans did not take him seriously, therefore, they had sent their little amount of army to defeat him, however, Spartacus send his best soldiers into war, therefore, he won the battle.
Finally, the author posits that Spartacus liberate roman slaves because he became an early human rights advocate. The author contends that even though roman senators have made an offer to him to become one of the elite members of Rome, he was rejected because of protecting the slaves' dignity. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is it was not the historical truth, it was just a play that is made up of 1800s century anti-slave. She notes that in the 1800s century they needed inspiration from ancient history to make a powerful anti-slave movement therefore they had written a play about him like he did this for slaves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...artacuss motivation to win that battle. The lecturer disputes the all claims made i...
^^^
Line 4, column 278, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'slaves'' or 'slave's'?
Suggestion: slaves'; slave's
... was rejected because of protecting the slaves dignity. In contrast, the lecturers sta...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 311, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...ng the slaves dignity. In contrast, the lecturers stance is it was not the historical tru...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 22.412803532 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 331.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89728096677 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48084271031 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540785498489 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5605602768 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3529411765 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 7.06452816374 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385268740027 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109290301406 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797835084072 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213599799435 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920653678864 0.0443174109184 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.