TPO 64
The reading passage makes a point that a new type of broccoli which could not only be grown in mild summer but also hotter weather has been created and it has several potential benefits. The professor, in contrast, holds a different point that the benefits mentioned in the passage are not likely to success.
First, even though the reading passage suggests that new broccoli would lower the cost for consumer because the transportation fees have been reduced, the professor argues in the lecture that it is no necesserary for broccoli to be sold in a lower price. This is because the yield of the new broccoli has also been decreased either, which indicates that farmers growing new broccoli would harvest less and then sell the vegetables in a high price.
Moreover, despite the statement in the reading that the new broccoli are crossbreeded instead of being genetically modified, which makes the new broccoli more desirable and less controversial, the professor contneds that it is not the fact. Then she supports the view with the fact that new broccoli and genetically modified crops,which is quite controverrsial, are created by a same company. In this case, people would probably distrust the company and reject the new broccoli.
Finally, contrary to what is mentioned in the reading that new broccoli could be sold sooner, which is more healthier to the buyers, the professor maintains that other vegetables also have the similar nurtrition as the broccoli. So, the government should educate people to buy the vegetables which could be available locally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
... broccoli and genetically modified crops,which is quite controverrsial, are created by...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'healthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: healthier
...broccoli could be sold sooner, which is more healthier to the buyers, the professor maintains ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, so, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12451361868 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72504137674 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494163424125 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.1271907954 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.333333333 110.228320801 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5555555556 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513357916516 0.272083759551 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.233516566285 0.0996497079465 234% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107170024536 0.0662205650399 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325652267486 0.162205337803 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756692992002 0.0443174109184 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.