TPO12
The lecture and the article are both about the portrat of Jane Austen who was a famous novelist. There is not any picture of Jane just a portrat and a weak sketch of her face. The reading feels that the exsistence Jane portrait is belong to her otherwise it has not any signature of the painter and provide three posible explanations. The lecturer chellenges the claims made by the article. He claims that these explanations are faulty.
To begin with, the author states that the Austin's familly recognize it as a portrat of the Austin in 1882. The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer, he is of the opinion that the relatives of the Austin proved the Austin's portrate 70 years old after her daeth and probabely they had not seen the Austin at all.
Secondly, the author suggests that the similarity between the sketch and the portrait is very surprising and the similarity can show that the portrait and the sketch are belong to one person. The lecture, however, rebuutes this by mentioning that the Austins family waa very large and the Austins causins were similar to her and they were at the same age.
Last but not least, the writer posits that the work perod of painter was similar to the teenager ages of Austin. In contrast, the lecturer position is that the painter canvas that used for this painting was purchesd when the Austin was 27 years old.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...ls that the exsistence Jane portrait is belong to her otherwise it has not any signatu...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: THE_NN_AND_THE_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'are'?
Suggestion: are
...ity between the sketch and the portrait is very surprising and the similarity can ...
^^
Line 9, column 171, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...ow that the portrait and the sketch are belong to one person. The lecture, however, re...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71487603306 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37560182936 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51652892562 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.023516615 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.727272727 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213759619204 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801076280094 0.0996497079465 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652953269615 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120371363332 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673894463056 0.0443174109184 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.