TPO 28
The reading and the lecture are both about reaching the north pole by E. Peary. The author feels that Peary indeed has been reached to the north pole and provides three reasons of support. The lecture challenges the claim made by the author. He is of the opinion that these explanations are faulty.
To begin with, the article states that national geography investigations can prove Peary's claims. The specific argument is challenged by the author, He claims that the National Geographic investigation was not really objective because They are close friends. Additionally, he says N.G was the Peary's trip Supervisor and their measurement take only two days and this time was not enough.
Secondly, the article claims that the journey time of Peary was equal to Avery who reaches the north poles. The lecture, however, refutes this by mentioning that Avery's food was come by airplane and he did not face any bad weather condition in contrast with Peary.
Last but not least, the article posits that Peary has some pictures which can prove his claim. Moreover, in the article, it is stated that the calculation of the surf's position in the sun is possible by measuring the shadows in Peary's photograph. In contrast, the lecturer position is that this measuring was not very accurate and the proof of his claim is not possible without precise measurement. He notes that these photos are not very clear and they are very blur to judge this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... and provides three reasons of support. The lecture challenges the claim made by th...
^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: G
... close friends. Additionally, he says N.G was the Pearys trip Supervisor and thei...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92653061224 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51227722587 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555102040816 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0152827521 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8461538462 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409781907223 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143543890529 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907320695122 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24180549189 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563243462152 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.