Although the passage introduces three main hypotheses to support the fact that birds population has been decreased in the United State recently and this trend will be continued in the future, the professor finds all the reasons dubious and brings up three conspicuous points to refute them all.
Considering the first point, the reading material argues that human population expansion causes vanishing the bird’s habitat such as wetlands and forests and convert them into the places for human settlements. However, the speaker finds it unconvincing and asserts that urban growth has provided copious habitats for birds. Although urban growth has declined some birds’ population, it has increased some other type of birds throughout the cities. For example, the number of pigeons and seagulls has increased while the other types has declined.
Furthermore, the reading passage claims that with increase in human population, the demands for more food will enhance and the agricultural activities will be increased which result in more wild lands will become agricultural lands and the birds’ habitant will be destroyed. In contrast, the lecturer states that the United States has recently used fewer lands to grow new crops since they do not need more lands. This means that less lands in use, less habitat disappear.
Eventually the author holds the view that usage of toxic pesticides and chemical materials to prevent harmful insects and species for crops will augment according to the human population expansion which will result in water pollution. It also causes birds stop breeding and extinct. Whereas the speaker contends that the effect of pesticides will be less than before due to the fact it has changed a lot. Not only are new pesticides less toxic but also new pest resistant crop are genetically improved which birds can use them without any harm.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun lands is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...do not need more lands. This means that less lands in use, less habitat disappear. ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...causes birds stop breeding and extinct. Whereas the speaker contends that the effect of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, so, whereas, while, for example, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32107023411 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57112556701 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555183946488 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.02225466 49.2860985944 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.583333333 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.479004467118 0.272083759551 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147339619218 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880926115958 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255670674467 0.162205337803 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718570016185 0.0443174109184 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.