tpo29-integrated writing
Both the reading and listening parts offer two opposite viewpoints about the possibility of Edmontosauru's migration. While the passage presents some arguments to verify this possibility, the lecturer, on the other hand, rejects all considered arguments; besides, presents some clues to call those arguments into the questions.
First of all, the text refers to the Edmontosauru's diet, which it was herbivore and the harsh condition at the winter did not provide the sufficient food sources; thus, it had to migrate the milder zone during the winter. On the contrary, the professor casts doubt on the accuracy of this assumption. As she explains, on that period, during the summer the North Slope was worm and got the sunlight for 24 hours; therefore, there was a favorable place for the growing plants and lots of herbs grew on that time, and their leftovers were adequate to support Edmontosaurus during the cold winters too. Thus, there was no lack of nutrition to oblige the Edmontosaurus to migrate.
Secondly, the passage considered the Edmontosaurus lived in the herb as the indicator of easily-organized migration. On the other hand, the instructor refutes the accuracy of this hypothesis too. As she discussed, the animals do not live in herb only for the migration, it also possesses other benefits such as the protection from the predator. For instance, a specific type of elks which are herbivore also live in herb without migrating to another location; since living in the herb gives the other advantageous. Therefore, the unearthed groups of skeletons do not approve they live in a herb to migrate.
Finally, meanwhile, the article highlights the physical ability of Edmontosaurus, which make them capable of migrating with the high speed and long duration, the lecturer gives more detailed information about this ability and makes this argument shaky too. As she posits, although the adult dinosaurs owned this ability and they could migrate that long-distance, the young dinosaurs did not have this capability. So, if the migrate in the group the youths could slow down the entire herb and do not allow them to make the considered distance. Also, since there was no feasibility of leaving the young Edmontosaurus behand, they did not migrate to the other zone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 421, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rs did not have this capability. So, if the migrate in the group the youths could slow down...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, such as, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1373.03311258 140% => OK
No of words: 370.0 270.72406181 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18648648649 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86328487793 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524324324324 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 419.366225166 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 1.25165562914 639% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7225143226 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.933333333 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2427372263 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748183142935 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510668901907 0.0662205650399 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130591832567 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667741883463 0.0443174109184 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 63.6247240618 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.