TPO3 Q1
The article states that a dutch painting which once attributed to Rembrandt isn't actually painted by him, and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor acknowledge the validity of the statements given in the reading but reasons that these facts can be justified in other ways rather than the assumption Rembrandt haven't painted the art.
First, the reading claims that there is a contradict between the cheap dress of the lady in the painting which was exclusive to servants and her luxurious fur coat ,and such a mistake couldn't be made by Rembrandt. The professor refutes the conclusion by mentioning that the fur coat was not originally part of the painting. X-ray experiments have indicated that it was added years later because they thought a fancy dressed lady in the painting would make it more valuable than a servant.
Second, the reading posits that the face portrayed in the painting must be in shadow because the dark fur below the face cannot reflect the light but the face is surprisingly illuminated. The professor explains that in the original painting, the area of the added fur had white color so the lightness of the face were completely in harmony in the original painting.
Third, the article claims that the painting's panel consists of several wood pieces glued together while none of Rembrandt’s works were in such a condition. The professor justified this contradict by explaining that they have enlarged the original painting by gluing other pieces to paint the fur coat and enrich the value of the painting for better sell. She also mentions that the original single wood piece of the painting is from the same tree which Rembrandt utilized for his other paintings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ting which once attributed to Rembrandt isnt actually painted by him, and provides t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...ys rather than the assumption Rembrandt havent painted the art. First, the readin...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...First, the reading claims that there is a contradict between the cheap dress of the lady in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e to servants and her luxurious fur coat ,and such a mistake couldnt be made by Re...
^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... luxurious fur coat ,and such a mistake couldnt be made by Rembrandt. The professor ref...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07719298246 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61372658017 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529824561404 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.0852054843 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.7 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 21.698381199 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.