TPO3-TASK1
Both the reading passage and the lecturer are discussing whether the Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet was painted by Rembrandt or not. The reading passage state that because of some evidence the painter of it was not Rembrandt. However, the professor casts doubt on the points made in the reading due to some recent examinations showing the portrait is indeed was painted by Rembrandt.
First, considering the article there is an inconsistency in the women's clothing which is opposite to Rembrandt's regard to details of the subject's clothing. In contrast, the professor in the lecture contradicts the idea and further explains that analysis on the painting pigments shows that there was no fur collar in the original painting and it has added to the painting 100 years after the year in which the portrait was made in order to increase its value and to make it like a formal aristocratic woman.
Second, the reading claims that the light and shadow in this portrait are not fitted together. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes the information presented in the article and makes the point that when the over top color is removed, in the original painting the woman has a simple light color cloth illuminating her face and was not thereby in partial shadow.
Third, the author in the passage puts forward the idea that this portrait is painted on several glued pieces of wood panels, while Rembrandt used to paint in a single wood panel. On the other hand, the speaker contradicts the idea and adds that when the over top layer was added upon the pointing, this pieces also were added to enlarge it from sides and top to make it more grand and valuable and the original painting was painted in a single piece of wood panel which was cut from the same three that another Rembrandt's painting panel, self-portrait with a hat, was.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 570, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g panel, self-portrait with a hat, was.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, third, while, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.790625 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48778068454 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4875 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 21.2450331126 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.510809496 49.2860985944 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 170.333333333 110.228320801 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.5555555556 21.698381199 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5555555556 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.3589403974 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.498013245 152% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.