Do you agree or disagree with the statement: to generate electricity, people should use clean sources like solar and wind and not use polluting sources like coal or oil.
With ever-growing industrial and domestic need for power, electricity generation is of a great significance. There are several methods to generate electricity which can be categorized into using the traditional fossil fuels and using clean energy such as solar and wind power. I would argue that we should use the latter in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, human-caused climate change and its consequences are among the most pressing problems in our era. As many of these desasters are reaching to a tipping point, where changes would be irreversable, we all are responsible to take actions. Experiencing the catastrophic issues caused by this, including more frequent floods, wildfires, and heat waves, there is consensus between people and governments to mitigate climate change. During last centruty, a major part of the green house gases (GHGs) came from using fossil fuels such as oil, coal, and natural gas to produce energy. Scinetists have worn us that even the natural gas, known as the most clean fossil fuel due to relative low CO2 emission compared with that of others, cannot avert the climate disaster. This is because the fact that not only burning these fuels to generate energy produce vast amount of GHGs, but their extraction and purification release a lot of CO2. Thus, an essential step to mitiage GHG emmision is to change our source of energies. Green and clean energies can be produced by solar panels, wind turbines, and hydropower plants, which are sustainable sources.
To add, transiton towards these realtively new energy sources requires research, technology development, investment, and training experts. Therefre, this transition is a huge opportunity for economic development. In other words, the capacity building required by going green in energy sector would result in several new jobs. Furthermore, these cleen energies are not as accessable as the traditionas ones right now, but once we reach to this ambitious goal of affordable clean energy for all, we can use these methods to improve quality of life in developing coutries. Developing countries such as countries in Africa and South Asia have enormous solar and wind energy potentials. For example, Kenya has a great potential for solar and wind energy, yet just a few percent of its energy comes from wind turbines due to lack of access to affordable required equippments and workforce with relevant experties. Moreover, small-scale solar panels could generate electricity at the household-level, which could provide sustainable clean energy for low-income families. If the generated electricity is more that ther demand, they can also sell the extra power and have an side income to improve their economic status.
To conclude, I believe we should go through transition towards 100% clean energies; this is the most effective way to reduce carbon footprint of energy section, and it would be a great opportunity for economic development, especially in developing countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1164, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... can also sell the extra power and have an side income to improve their economic s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, as to, for example, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2518.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34607218684 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87204884779 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566878980892 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 792.9 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2594137696 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.9 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.55 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194150238387 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584303465973 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495208600219 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129868465854 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764111386915 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.