Do you agree or disagree with the statement: to generate electricity, people should use clean sources like solar and wind and not use polluting sources like coal or oil?
There is no doubt our life affected by electricity power, our welfare and economic related on electricity. There is always a challenge for governments to generate electricity and the best way to provide electric power. In my opinion, to generate electricity, we should use clean sources. I have two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First, clean sources such as solar and wind are more accessible than polluting sources. Every country can access wind and solar energy, but oil and coal are limited. According to this, countries are much dependent on themselves, and they do not rely on other countries. For example, in 2014, after Crimea annexed Russia, the European Union imposed sanctions on the Russian government. After that, Russia decided to increase the cost of oil output; as a result, the cost of energy in Europe had proliferation. If European countries relied more on clean sources, the action of Russia- increased the cost of oil and gas supply- would not have affected their economy.
Second, Clean sources have other benefits, and it does not produce greenhouses. When we use oil or carol, we release many Carbons Dioxide into the air, but solar or wind energy has zero Carbon emissions. If we put solar energy first to generate electrical power, maybe we can help the environment by not releasing carbon. For example, Tehran burning Mazut to supply electricity. As a result, the pollution is so increased in this city. This emission harms the environment, such as releasing toxic substances into the air, and the end the cause of many illnesses. Using clean sources instead of fossil sources can bring a greener and cleaner world to us.
In conclusion, I agree with the statement that we should use clean sources; first of all, the countries that do not have fossil sources more rely on themself and are not dependent on countries that have fossil sources. My other reason is clean sources can prevent the world from greenhouse effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ring a greener and cleaner world to us. .In conclusion, I agree with the statemen...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ng a greener and cleaner world to us. .In conclusion, I agree with the statement ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96951219512 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64760563264 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8081613374 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7894736842 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2631578947 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29259549373 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840638875287 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751854718163 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17325526697 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383708731354 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.